home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!news.u.washington.edu!harajuku.tjp.washington.edu!jonwd
- From: jonwd@uwtc.washington.edu (Jon Wiederspan)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
- Subject: Re: SuperCard 1.6 needs much improvements
- Message-ID: <1992Aug31.172326.21741@u.washington.edu>
- Date: 31 Aug 92 17:23:26 GMT
- References: <1992Aug28.204830.8633@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Technical Japanese Program
- Lines: 65
- X-Xxmessage-Id: <A6C797209B01CA3F@harajuku.tjp.washington.edu>
- X-Xxdate: Mon, 31 Aug 92 17:30:08 GMT
- X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d9
-
- In article <1992Aug29.185257.1@acfcluster.nyu.edu> XIXAX,
- drennan@acfcluster.nyu.edu writes:
- >......SuperCard has gone
- >off in a different direction, true. But a more robust development
- platform of
- >the hypertalk variety does not exist.
-
- I'm glad someone started this thread because I'm wondering what features
- people
- want to see most in the next SuperCard.
-
- I would like to see SuperCard continue to diverge from HyperCard and
- become a professional level environment (whatever THAT means). Not only
- that, but I believe this move is *necessary* for SuperCard to continue to
- be a viable product.
-
- ***Disclaimer: I *like* SuperCard and I'll continue to use it even if
- everything below
- is not added.***
-
- Reason(s): Although, SuperCard is the most robust hypermedia development
- platform
- *for the Macintosh* (Unix has some even better stuff now), the additional
- capabilities
- vs. HyperCard are not overwhelming enough in most cases (including all of
- the
- HyperTalk novices and beginners) to make up for it being harder to learn
- to use and
- a more expensive. There is a market that is being virtually ignored by
- both applications, however; that of the professional hypermedia developer
- (like myself). Our needs have moved far beyond HyperCard or SuperCard's
- capabilities. Development is a constant battle of finding the right
- XCMD/XFCN's for our needs and patching in products like CompileIT,
- MasterScript, and others to provide something approaching speed in
- development and delivery. We need (and others want) an environment that
- provides us with:
-
- 1) Access to a large portion of the Macintosh Toolbox, especially in
- file management, database access, serial/comm port control, sound,
- QuickTime, and foreign languages
-
- 2) Better text and printing capabilities
-
- 3) Powerful editing environment with lint-like script checker, ability
- to paste scripts and changes to multiple targets simultaneously (or group
- scripts), access to object scripts from any level (don't waste time
- opening windows to access an object's script), markers in the scripts,
- and (dream wish) the ability to continue scripts that have been halted
- for errors (without using ScriptTracer).
-
- 4) The ability to compile at least *some* portion of a project.
- CompileIT's capabilities would be great. Compiling an entire project
- (for a non-editable distributable version) would be INCREDIBLE and
- instantly triple (or more) the value of SuperCard.
-
-
- I know that can get all of these capabilities with MPW or Think C and I
- can't see SuperCard (even with all of the features above) replacing
- these. On the other hand, though, HyperCard originally promised an
- environment to turn the 'rest of us' into powerful Macintosh programmers.
- I'd like to see SuperCard take a BIG step in that direction.
-
- Jon Wiederspan jonwd@uwtc.washington.edu
- Research Consultant - Software Design
- University of Washington
-