home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:12232 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:23383
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!rutgers!psuvax1!atlantis.psu.edu!chopin!boltz
- From: boltz@chopin.psu.edu (Mark Boltz)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Subject: Those Intel Processors (what is SX/DX)
- Summary: An explanation of Intel processor designations for i8088 family
- Keywords: bananas, Fahrvergnugen
- Message-ID: <3p*vH0?-e9@atlantis.psu.edu>
- Date: 4 Sep 92 02:40:17 GMT
- Sender: news@atlantis.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Organization: Penn State University
- Lines: 111
-
- Someone asked awhile ago what the DX and SX meant for intel's processors,
- so I thought I would try to straighten out the confusion. This info is
- coming from a copy of Intel's Product Overview 1992, so it isn't *completely*
- up-to-date, but close.
-
- 8088
- 8 bit bus (data)
- 16 bit internal data path
- 5, 8 Mhz clock frequency
- 1 MB memory addressability
- no virtual memory
- 64 KB I/O addressability
- 8087 math coprocessor
-
- 8086
- 16 bit data bus
- 16 bit internal data path
- 5, 8, 10 Mhz clock frequency
- 1 MB memory addressability
- no virtual memory
- 64 KB I/O addressability
- 8087 math coprocessor
-
- 80286 (80186 used in embedded control market, not pc's)
- 16 bit data bus
- 16 bit internal data path
- 8, 10, 12, 16 Mhz clock frequency
- 16 MB memory addressability
- 64 KB I/O addressability
- virtual memory
- 80287 XL/XLT math coprocessor
-
- 80386 SX
- 16 bit data bus
- 32 bit internal data path
- 16, 20 Mhz clock frequency
- 16 MB memory addressability
- virtual memory
- 64 KB I/O addressability
- 80387SX coprocessor
-
- 80386 SL
- 16 bit data bus
- 32 bit internal data path
- 20, 25 Mhz clock frequency
- 32 MB memory addressability
- virtual memory
- 64 KB I/O addressability
- 80387SX coprocessor
- SL developed for notebook computers, also differentiates itself
- from the others with built-in disk controller, wait-state logic and
- a cache that the other 386s don't have - optimizes its power usage
-
- 80386 DX
- 32 bit data bus
- 32 bit internal data path
- 16, 20, 25, 33, 40 Mhz
- 4 GB memory addressability
- virtual memory
- 64 KB I/O addressability
- 80387 DX coprocessor
- 80486 SX
- 32 bit data bus
- 32 bit internal data path
- 16, 20, 25 Mhy
- 4 GB memory addressability
- virtual memory
- 64 KB I/O addressability
- 80487SX coprocessor
-
- 80486 DX
- 32 bit data bus
- 32 bit internal data path
- 25, 33, 40, 50 Mhz
- 4 GB memory addressability
- 64 KB I/O addressability
- coprocessor built-in
-
- Both 486s have an 8KB internal cache on the chip.
- As seen above the 386 DX/SX difference lies in the external data bus bit
- size. The SX, although similar to the DX, has to wait longer to process
- information, because it can only receive it in 16 bit chunks, rather than
- the 32 bit stuff the DX gets fed. It is faster than a 286, but slower than
- the 386 DX. Why do this? Intel found its monopoly on microprocessors for
- PC's pinched with the introduction of American Micro Devices (?) or AMD.
- The Am386 is a better chip, IMHO.
- The difference between the 486 SX/DX is, for similar reasons, one has a
- coprocessor built into the chip, the other (SX) doesn't. Rumor has it this
- was an accident, that Intel had 486 chips with defective coprocessors, so to
- unload them, they marketed them as such.
-
- The 486 DX/2 is a 486DX with a normal external clock rate of 25 or 33 Mhz,
- but the chip itself is running at twice that external rate. (ie 50 or 66 Mhz)
-
- The 486 Overdrive is (basically) a 486 DX with the processor turned off, but
- with a functioning coprocessor. It is NOT a 487SX, which is just a coproc.,
- because the Overdrive has the advantage of the extra 8 KB cache and other
- internal support functions. I believe this goes in the copro socket, and
- will still allow a regular 487SX to 'piggy back' it.
- Neat concept, that you can have a 486SX with an overdrive and a 487SX, and
- come out with a faster machine than the 486-40. You spend a lot more on the
- chip stuff tho. *shrug*
-
- Hope that helps cut through some of the confusion.
- (Any glaring errors are probably typos...if not, blame Intel, its THEIR book.
-
- ---------
- boltz@vivaldi.psu.edu
-
- Intel Product Overview 1992 (c) 1992 Intel Corporation
- The processor types are trademarks of the Intel Corporation.
-