home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!po.CWRU.Edu!dab6
- From: dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell)
- Subject: Thumbs down for MAG (was Re: Standard Computer (and os/2)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug26.202921.27941@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ins.cwru.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: slc10.ins.cwru.edu
- Reply-To: dab6@po.CWRU.Edu (Douglas A. Bell)
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
- References: <1992Aug26.185801.26189@news.columbia.edu>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 92 20:29:21 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
-
- In a previous article, hpw@cunixb.cc.columbia.edu (Harry P Warren) says:
-
- >
- >I am trying to decide if I should buy this system for use with OS/2 2.0:
- >
- > Standard Computers - Windows Workstation Plus
- > 33 MHz 486
- > 16 MB of RAM
- > 64 k Cache
- > 15" MAG Monitor
-
- I had just bought a mag 15" monitor and was less than happy with it.
- At 800x600, the display was fuzzy and difficult to read compared to by
- old 60hz 14" monitor. I just returned for a refund because I didn't
- want to pay shipping costs to look at another fuzzy monitor.
-
-