home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!rodan.jdola.lanl.gov!gavin.adams
- From: Gavin Adams <gavin.adams@lso.mts.dec.com>
- Subject: Re: Confusion on Falcon 3.0 hints
- Message-ID: <1992Aug28.145340.27158@newshost.lanl.gov>
- X-Xxmessage-Id: <A6C39972DD02BA10@rodan.jdola.lanl.gov>
- X-Xxdate: Fri, 28 Aug 92 08:50:58 GMT
- Sender: news@newshost.lanl.gov
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
- X-Useragent: Nuntius v1.1.1d7
- References: <21200@optima.cs.arizona.edu>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 14:53:40 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <21200@optima.cs.arizona.edu> Justin C. Hogue,
- hogue@cs.arizona.edu writes:
- > If you have a problem with getting nailed from behind while getting
- another
- >guy, you can protect yourself by denying your wingmans request to engage.
- >Keep him on your wing if you have trouble so you (or him) can turn around
- >and get the guy, while the other can keep working on the old target.
- It's
- >mostly an idea from real wingman (see top gun).
-
- I've never thought of doing this. It would makes sense that you'd have
- to set up at least to flights, one with you and a single wingman, and
- another flight with any other CAP/Intercept planes. After getting shot
- down by a MiG-19 last night (while I was sliding into the kill-zone on
- another), this is my weekend's endeavor (beside's bagging green chiles).
-
- --- Gavin
- Visualize Whirled Peas!
-