home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: mjs@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Marc Sabatella)
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 17:43:01 GMT
- Subject: Re: CC and /usr/lib/dld.sl
- Message-ID: <7371285@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM>
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!scd.hp.com!cupnews0.cup.hp.com!hppad.waterloo.hp.com!hppad!hpfcso!mjs
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
- References: <1992Sep1.091000.14893@irfu.se>
- Lines: 21
-
- In comp.sys.hp, jhd@irfu.se (Jan D.) writes:
-
- > Thanks for your answer. But I still get this from xdb:
- >
- > <<<< XDB Version A.08.07 HP-UX >>>>
- > Child died due to: segmentation violation
- > Program died in unknown location (shared library), pc = 0x1000003
- > Ignoring core file "core".
-
- Try running the program under xdb, rather than simply using it to analyze the
- core file. Then it should at least be able to tell you which library it died
- in. If it indeed died in libdld.sl, there would seem to be a problem with the
- C++ and/or shared library implementation. But 0x1000003 is a suspiciously
- bogus looking address; I suspect really the program just did something very bad
- and confused xdb into thinking it had something to do with shared libraries.
-
- --------------
- Marc Sabatella (marc@hpmonk.fc.hp.com)
- Disclaimers:
- 2 + 2 = 3, for suitably small values of 2
- Bill (H.) and Dave (P.) may not always agree with me
-