home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!torn!utgpu!gbcusg
- From: gbcusg@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (I. Barnett)
- Subject: Re: Falcon Graphics
- Message-ID: <Bu1Dyu.IA0@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
- Organization: UTCS Public Access
- References: <1992Aug25.124510.2938@aber.ac.uk> <5pyyc3q@rpi.edu>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1992 04:32:53 GMT
- Lines: 11
-
- In your post, you say that the latest Mac LC (the LCII) is better that the
- Falcon. Where do you get this from? The LCII is a 16 Mhz '030 : tie. It will
- support 16-bit graphics but only up to a 13" monitor...for mor color/resolution
- you need a graphics card. The Falcon's sound just kill the LCII. The LCII is
- in direct comptetion with the Falcon, not the Classic II, plus the Falcon is
- cheaper. The only thing that the LCII has is a superior O/S but TOS is
- getting better.
-
- Darren King, GBC :: emai : gbcusg@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca
-
-
-