home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!psinntp!psinntp!isc-newsserver!kxs5829
- From: kxs5829@ultb.isc.rit.edu (K.X. Saunders )
- Subject: Re: Question about GCC and DICE?
- Message-ID: <1992Sep2.191141.1787@ultb.isc.rit.edu>
- Originator: kxs5829@ultb
- Sender: news@ultb.isc.rit.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ultb-gw.isc.rit.edu
- Organization: Rochester Institute of Technology
- References: <L4gBr*p02@emcamiga.UUCP>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1992 19:11:41 GMT
- Lines: 38
-
- In article <L4gBr*p02@emcamiga.UUCP> emcamiga!malcolm@redpoll.neoucom.edu writes:
- >I recently, in the last day or so, installed GCC 2.2.2 on my system and
- >from what I can tell it works ok. The question I have is about acquiring
- >Commodore's 2.0 header files for use with GCC.
- >
- >I'm planning on getting a registered copy of DICE and have a few questions
- >about it.
- >
- > 1. Does the registered version of DICE come with CBM's 2.0 headers and
- > libraries?
-
- Yes.
-
- > 2. Will the 2.0 headers and libraries that come with DICE also work with
- > GCC or will I have to get them seperately?
-
- Yes. This is my setup.
-
- > 3. I'd also like to know how others feel about DICE as compared to SAS &
- > Manx.
-
- I don't know about Manx, but if I had the money, I would take SAS 6.0
- over the version of DICE that I have. I do have to say that DICE has a lot of
- nice features and when all the bugs are out, it will be a nice system.
-
- > 4. How ANSI compatible is DICE? I take source code between systems quite
- > frequently (Amiga Manx, MS-DOS Borland C++ and HP Unix systems at
- > school).
-
- You shouldn't have too many problems.
-
- - Kyle
-
- --
- +-"Remember, [MS]DOS is sort of a UNIX deviant already" - dmoscny@piglet.-----+
- | // Only /\ kxs5829@ultb.isc.rit.edu cincinatti. |
- | \ // /--\MIGA kyle@nick.csh.rit.edu oh.us |
- | \X/ SQLdb - $40 rdbms Rochester Institute of Technology |
-