home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!news.byu.edu!news.mtholyoke.edu!nic.umass.edu!dime!barrett
- From: barrett@astro.cs.umass.edu (Daniel Barrett)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: benchmarks: SAS 6.0 vs Aztec 5.2b
- Message-ID: <52753@dime.cs.umass.edu>
- Date: 1 Sep 92 00:00:08 GMT
- References: <paulk.1aqc@terapin.com> <BtuMn6.JvK@unx.sas.com>
- Sender: news@dime.cs.umass.edu
- Reply-To: barrett@astro.cs.umass.edu (Daniel Barrett)
- Organization: BLAZEMONGER INCORPORATED
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <BtuMn6.JvK@unx.sas.com> walker@twix.unx.sas.com (Doug Walker) writes:
- > #include <intuition/intuition.h>
- > #include <graphics/gfxbase.h>
- > #include <clib/alib_protos.h>
- >
- >With no GST, SAS/C version 6 takes 5.3 seconds to compile this file
- >(include files on hard disk, A3000/25).
- >With the GST generated but not loaded into RAM, SAS/C version 6 takes
- >0.7 seconds to compile the same file. After the GST is loaded into
- >RAM, it takes only 0.2 seconds to compile.
-
- Aztec C 5.2a takes 7.2 seconds to compile without precompiled
- headers, 1.3 seconds with precompiled headers, and 0.9 seconds with
- the compiled header file in RAD:.
-
- Aztec C is not "resident", so this timing includes the time
- for "cc" to be loaded from disk. This is on a stock A3000T/25.
-
- Dan
-
- //////////////////////////////////////\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
- | Dan Barrett -- Dept of Computer Science, Lederle Graduate Research Center |
- | University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 -- barrett@cs.umass.edu |
- \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\/////////////////////////////////////
-