home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!kithrup!stanford.edu!ames!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!convex!news.oc.com!utacfd.uta.edu!rwsys!caleb!jdp
- From: jdp@caleb.UUCP (Jim Pritchett)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Speculations: Amiga and Mach?
- Message-ID: <waUAr*FU0@caleb.UUCP>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 00:27:44 GMT
- References: <1992Aug15.003726.5366@hpmcaa.mcm.hp.com> <56791@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
- <wk+yr*dS0@caleb.UUCP> <heinz.0364@edohwg.UUCP>
- Organization: is sometimes desirable
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <heinz.0364@edohwg.UUCP>, Heinz Wrobel writes:
-
- > In article <wk+yr*dS0@caleb.UUCP> jdp@caleb.UUCP (Jim Pritchett) writes:
- > >In article <rwm.713991011@atronx.OCUnix.On.Ca>, Russell McOrmond writes:
- > >
- > >> Developers need firewalls, users do not. Developers use MMU based machines.
- > >
- > >I strongly disagree with this statement. I have had several "commercial"
- > >programs which would not run well together.
- >
- > How about: Developers __SHOULD__ use MMU based machines.
-
- Ok by me. However, there may still be some poor developers using stock 68000
- machines out there.
-
-
- Jim Pritchett
-
-
- UUCP: rwsys.lonestar.org!caleb!jdp
- or utacfd.uta.edu!rwsys!caleb!jdp
-