home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!fulcrum!sie
- From: sie@fulcrum.bt.co.uk (Simon Raybould)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: SASC 6.0 (food for thought)
- Message-ID: <SIE.92Aug28144523@introitus.fulcrum.bt.co.uk>
- Date: 28 Aug 92 14:45:23 GMT
- References: <25440014@hpsad.sad.hp.com> <BtHqsn.Cyv@unx.sas.com>
- <1992Aug25.011316.708@crd.ge.com> <BtJLKF.KAL@unx.sas.com>
- <1992Aug25.163419.6513@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <BtJw33.A64@unx.sas.com>
- <1992Aug25.221919.12437@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <BtLDsK.z9@unx.sas.com>
- Sender: news@fulcrum.bt.co.uk
- Organization: Fulcrum Communications Ltd., Birmingham, England
- Lines: 53
- In-Reply-To: walker@twix.unx.sas.com's message of 26 Aug 92 13:07:32 GMT
-
- In article <BtLDsK.z9@unx.sas.com> walker@twix.unx.sas.com (Doug Walker) writes:
-
- Path: fulcrum!uknet!mcsun!uunet!gatech!concert!sas!mozart.unx.sas.com!walker
- From: walker@twix.unx.sas.com (Doug Walker)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Date: 26 Aug 92 13:07:32 GMT
- References: <25440014@hpsad.sad.hp.com> <BtHqsn.Cyv@unx.sas.com> <1992Aug25.011316.708@crd.ge.com> <BtJLKF.KAL@unx.sas.com> <1992Aug25.163419.6513@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <BtJw33.A64@unx.sas.com> <1992Aug25.221919.12437@ccu.umanitoba.ca>
- Sender: news@unx.sas.com (Noter of Newsworthy Events)
- Organization: SAS Institute Inc.
- Lines: 31
- Originator: walker@twix.unx.sas.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: twix.unx.sas.com
-
-
- In article <1992Aug25.221919.12437@ccu.umanitoba.ca>, kaarts@ccu.umanitoba.ca (Kenneth John Aarts) writes:
- |> In general, what is the average speedup for a generic program by generating
- |> 030 specific code?
-
- It depends on what the program is doing and how it is doing it.
- The '030 has a lot of new addressing modes, so if you are doing
- a lot of memory-indirect references it could speed you up.
-
- I got curious and tried the Dhrystone 2.0 benchmark on my A3000.
- I got the following results:
-
- V5.10, 68000: 6362.7 Dhrystones/sec
-
- V5.10, 68030: 7287.4 "
-
- V6.0, 68000: 8039.4 "
-
- V6.0, 68030: 8708.3 "
-
- This was with full optimization and registerized parameters
- in both versions.
-
-
- What about the 68040 ?
- There are quite a lot of amigas around with 68040's these days.
- --
- *****
- =*|_o_o|\\=====Doug Walker, Software Distiller====== BBS: (919)460-7430 =
- *|. o.| || 1200/2400/9600 Dual
- | o |// For all you do, this bug's for you!
- ======
- usenet: walker@unx.sas.com bix: djwalker
- Any opinions expressed are mine, not those of SAS Institute, Inc.
-
- --
- Simon J Raybould (sie@fulcrum.bt.co.uk) // {o.o}
- "Only joking ... Or am I ?" - Vic Reeves \X/AMIGA \-/
- ===========================================================================
- Fulcrum communications L.T.D., Fordrough Lane, Birmingham, B9 5LD, ENGLAND.
-