home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!corax.udac.uu.se!Minsk.DoCS.UU.SE!tommyi
- From: tommyi@Minsk.DoCS.UU.SE (Tommy The King)
- Subject: Re: HST & SUpra: which is faster?
- Message-ID: <1992Aug25.174145.13257@corax.udac.uu.se>
- Sender: news@corax.udac.uu.se
- Organization: INRIA Sophia Antipolis, France
- References: <kehlet.06hg@kehlet.adsp.sub.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 17:41:45 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <kehlet.06hg@kehlet.adsp.sub.org>, kehlet@kehlet.adsp.sub.org (Jesper Kehlet) writes:
- > In article <1992Aug21.013325.8441@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu> coup@crs.cl.msu.edu (Chris Klaus) writes:
- > >
- > >
- > >
- > > I am getting a SupraFax 14.4K baud modem. But I use to have an
- > > HST. From one source, Ive heard that HST was faster than
- > > SupraFax's protocal. Like SupraFax would get only 1600 cps
- > > transfering the same file as HST at 1800 cps. Is there any validity
- > > to that statement?
- > >
- > > Which is faster? I would think they were the same.
- >
- > The HST standard uses a backtalk channel at only 450 bps, when
- > Supra/TwinCom etc. uses a full-blown backtalk on 14,400 bps, so consider
- > HST the slowest...
- >
-
- ...ehh...are all of you just stupid or what? the latest hsts run in 16800
- baud and v.32bis runs in 14400 baud.. end of discussion...
-
- _______ __ ______ _______
- \ ___ \ \_|\ __ \\ /\ /\\ ___ \ /\ !! 1.2 Gig Amiga !!
- \/| |\ \| ||\/_/ // \ \ / \\/| |\ \/ \
- | | \ \ || / \_/ // /\ \ | | \ \/\ \ +46-(0)18-463380 HST/V.32
- \ | / / |\ |\ \\ // /__\ \\ | / /__\ \ +46-(0)18-463383 HST
- \|/ / \| \|/ / \_//_____\\_\\|/ /___\\_\ +46-(0)18-463381 2400
- \/ \/ \/
-