home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!TRANSARC.COM!Craig_Everhart
- From: Craig_Everhart@TRANSARC.COM
- Newsgroups: comp.soft-sys.andrew
- Subject: Re: Hasn't the message line bogosity gone on long enough?
- Message-ID: <YebZN3L0BwwtEe=GIA@transarc.com>
- Date: 28 Aug 92 16:37:23 GMT
- Article-I.D.: transarc.YebZN3L0BwwtEe=GIA
- References: <1992Aug26.215345.23827@adobe.com>
- Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
- Distribution: world
- Organization: The Internet
- Lines: 18
-
- Excerpts from internet.other.info-andrew: 26-Aug-92 Re: Hasn't the
- message line.. Zalman Stern@decwrl.dec. (3690)
-
- > [Aside: I don't recall the timestamped message line log that Adam described.
- > I'm pretty certain it wasn't in any implementation of framemessage while I
- > was at the ITC. So its either relatively recent or perhaps from bx or BE I?]
-
-
- I don't think that what Adam remembers was a timestamped message line
- log. The messages that Messages would put into its log contained
- timestamps, but the timestamps weren't an inherent property of the
- message line micro-window. (No, I don't know the totally-correct term
- here.)
-
- It may indeed have been in the BX version of Messages.
-
- Regards,
- Craig
-