home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!veritas!amdcad!weitek!pyramid!ctnews!88opensi!sartin
- From: sartin@88opensi.88open.ORG (Rob Sartin)
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.nfs
- Subject: Re: RPC version 3?
- Message-ID: <1992Aug24.175254.5057@88opensi.88open.ORG>
- Date: 24 Aug 92 17:52:54 GMT
- References: <sxn.714342225@rand> <1992Aug22.212034.16071@mtu.edu>
- Reply-To: sartin@88opensi.UUCP (Rob Sartin)
- Organization: 88open Consortium Ltd., San Jose
- Lines: 8
-
- In article <1992Aug22.212034.16071@mtu.edu> tomiii@mtu.edu (Thomas Dwyer III) writes:
- >Ahh, but I suspect version 3 might not be too far away, since PC-NFS
- >tries version 3 first, which fails and then it tries version 2.
-
- Version 3 of RPC? Or version 3 of rpcbind (version 2 of which is aka
- portmapper)? I don't know about a version 3 of the RPC protocol.
-
- Rob
-