home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #19 / NN_1992_19.iso / spool / comp / os / os2 / misc / 28906 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-09-01  |  1.0 KB  |  24 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!caen!destroyer!ubc-cs!unixg.ubc.ca!physics.ubc.ca!unruh
  3. From: unruh@physics.ubc.ca (William Unruh)
  4. Subject: Re: Difference between DOS upgrade and full version
  5. Message-ID: <unruh.715387898@physics.ubc.ca>
  6. Sender: news@unixg.ubc.ca (Usenet News Maintenance)
  7. Nntp-Posting-Host: physics.ubc.ca
  8. Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
  9. References: <1992Aug31.011021.15753@r-node.gts.org> <1992Aug31.095400.13874@actrix.gen.nz> <92244.103632CCHEW@UCF1VM.BITNET> <1992Sep1.132432.28949@njitgw.njit.edu>
  10. Date: Tue, 1 Sep 1992 22:51:38 GMT
  11. Lines: 11
  12.  
  13. dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap) writes:
  14.  
  15. >Note that your OS/2 "upgrade" install disks get marked once you make
  16. >your first installation with them.  Afterwards, they're just like
  17. >ordinary install disks.  You can install OS/2 onto an unformatted
  18. >system with it after this.
  19.  
  20.  
  21. Disk 1 does if it is not write protected ( mine was while disk 0 which
  22. it does
  23. not write to was not)
  24.