home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!feustel
- From: feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel)
- Subject: Re: Which is better: pmcomm or te2?
- Message-ID: <fygnjzb.feustel@netcom.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 92 18:26:35 GMT
- Organization: DAFCO: OS/2 Software Support & Consulting
- References: <1992Aug28.122747.22245@bas-a.bcc.ac.uk> <1992Aug29.004905.8158@actrix.gen.nz> <l9tq3lINN4qp@aludra.usc.edu> <dyfn_2q.feustel@netcom.com> <1992Aug30.103551.1675@gacvx2.gac.edu>
- Lines: 18
-
- logic@gacvx2.gac.edu writes:
-
- >In article <dyfn_2q.feustel@netcom.com>, feustel@netcom.com (David Feustel) writes:
- >> PMCOMM32 also permits scripts writen in C and compiled to exe.
- >> --
- >Really? Does this mean ANY C program, or are there limitations such as no
- >dynamic allocation, only string and integer variables allowed, etc.? Or does
- >this mean that PMCOMM32 has an EXECPGM function (or something similar) that
- >allows a script to start a child program?
-
- The sample program included with pmcomm is a cprogram which makes
- calls on the pmcomm dll to accomplish communication functions. I
- compiled that sample program with C Set/2 to produce an EXE and then
- invoked the EXE from pmcomm via the "execute script" option. Slick.
- --
- Dave Feustel N9MYI <feustel@netcom.com>
-
- ( New .sig under construction. Watch this space! )
-