home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2:264 comp.os.os2.misc:28586 comp.os.os2.programmer:4554 comp.os.os2.apps:5651 comp.os.os2.advocacy:4717
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2,comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!uwm.edu!linac!att!news.cs.indiana.edu!syscon!gator!dlpinc00!dlparker
- From: dlparker@dlpinc00.rn.com (David L. Parker)
- Subject: Re: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???
- Message-ID: <1992Aug29.104619.1323@dlpinc00.rn.com>
- Organization: Automated Data Management Services
- References: <714913121.20822@minster.york.ac.uk> <64786@cup.portal.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 10:46:19 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <64786@cup.portal.com> TomK@cup.portal.com (Tom R Krotchko) writes:
- >
- >As to waiting for NT, without being insulting, why would you think NT will
- >have any more or less problems than OS/2? They're cut from the same
- >cloth, so to speak. And surely, one will be as trouble prone as the
- >
-
- I'm curious - what do you mean, "... cut from the same cloth..."? As I
- understand it, NT is based on/derived from the Mach microkernel, which,
- if true would seem to me to represent a complete departure from DOS and
- OS/2.
- --
- Dave Parker
- Automated Data Management Services, Pleasant Hill, MO 64080-1331
- (816) 987-5167/5218 voice/fax
-