home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!lancea!lance
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.tools
- Subject: Re: Microsoft C/C++ 7.0 versus Borland C++ 3.1
- Message-ID: <715242303snx@lancea.actrix.gen.nz>
- From: lance@lancea.actrix.gen.nz (Lance Andrewes)
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 92 06:25:03 GMT
- References: <1992Aug29.024739.9311@runx.oz.au>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: none
- Lines: 13
-
- eau@runx.oz.au writes in article <1992Aug29.024739.9311@runx.oz.au>:
- >
- > We're trying to decide between Microsoft and Borland compilers
- > as a standard compiler for building our products. We will use
- > both compilers during development - the question is which one
- > to use to generate the final .EXE. [etc]
-
- There's a comprehensive review of C/C++ compilers in PC Magazine,
- July 92, volume 11 number 13.
-
- __
- _______ Email: lance@lancea.actrix.gen.nz
- //// ZL2AJH Wellington, New Zealand
-