home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!hotmomma!acc1bbs!dick.zeitlin
- From: dick.zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Dick Zeitlin)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
- Subject: 4DOS diversion (Was Re: A
- Message-ID: <2281.102.uupcb@ssr.com>
- Date: 24 Aug 92 23:26:00 GMT
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Advanced Computer Concepts BBS, New Rochelle, NY 914-654-1981
- Reply-To: dick.zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Dick Zeitlin)
- Lines: 18
-
- TS> .Seriously, because the majority of the PC users are using MsDos. As
- > .you might recall we already had a ____prolonged____ discussion (a
- > .good one at that) on this subject last spring in this very
- > .newsgroup.
-
- Sorry if this is bringing up an old issue, but I wasn't around last
- spring.
-
- I don't understand. You seem to be implying a dichotomy between 4Dos
- and MsDos. I'm using MsDos, and using the 4Dos shell. (Is it
- anything else but a shell? Just a replacement for COMMAND.COM, as far
- as I know.) I can't understand why this seems to be put in the same
- category as DR-Dos, which is indeed a replacement for MsDos.
-
- D/
-
- * OLX 2.2 * Dick.Zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com
-
-