home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!netcom.com!messina
- From: messina@netcom.com (Tony Porczyk)
- Subject: Re: 4DOS diversion (Was Re: A batch programming contest for you)
- Message-ID: <l8-nx7+.messina@netcom.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Aug 92 23:45:18 GMT
- Organization: Messina Software
- References: <1992Aug18.162657.27453@usenet.ins.cwru.edu> <1992Aug19.132543.7617@swlvx2.msd.ray.com> <4082@cruzio.santa-cruz.ca.us> <1992Aug22.184217.11378@uwasa.fi>
- Lines: 12
-
- ts@uwasa.fi (Timo Salmi) writes:
- >The unfortunate side of all this are the inevitable compatibility
- >problems. Without going much into the details I just run into one
- >in a TP program. Part of the error codes are dependent (returned
- >from) the command interpreter. (The particular case was different
- >IOResult values retuned when running with MsDos and with DRDOS).
-
- Wait. I am not sure I follow. Can you provide some details as to
- which I/O routine in your program has return values dependent on
- the command interpreter? Something doesn't compute...
-
- t.
-