home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!news.funet.fi!ajk.tele.fi!funic!nntp.hut.fi!cs.hut.fi!arl
- From: arl@cs.hut.fi (Ari Lemmke)
- Subject: Re: Benchmarking under Linux (was Re: New 486 Suggestions?
- In-Reply-To: bboerner@novell.com's message of 31 Aug 92 21:00:41 GMT
- Message-ID: <ARL.92Sep1021727@cardhu.cs.hut.fi>
- Lines: 16
- Sender: usenet@nntp.hut.fi (Usenet pseudouser id)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cardhu.cs.hut.fi
- Organization: Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
- References: <Aug.23.18.56.56.1992.8507@gauss.rutgers.edu> <pdhatchm.715057547@syzygy>
- <1992Aug31.180211.24228@news.acns.nwu.edu>
- <1992Aug31.210041.21832@novell.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1992 23:17:35 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
-
- In article <1992Aug31.210041.21832@novell.com> bboerner@novell.com (Brendan B. Boerner) writes:
- : I've got a 386/16Mhz w/a tad under 5MB of
- : RAM and it takes me somewhere between 3-4hours to build the kernel. On
- : my girlfriend's machine, a 486/33 w/8MB RAM, it takes under 10
- : minutes. I'd like to get an idea of where I could improve
- : performance.
-
- Marriage would be a solution ... ;-)
-
- But .. having faster disk, >2 MB swap, more memory (~8MB)
- would make the kernel compile faster.
-
- : Brendan B. Boerner Phone: 512/346-8380
-
- arl
-