home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!news2me.ebay.sun.com!exodus.Eng.Sun.COM!appserv.Eng.Sun.COM!slovax.Eng.Sun.COM!lm
- From: lm@slovax.Eng.Sun.COM (Larry McVoy)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: GNU kids on the block? (sorry... couldn't resist)
- Date: 27 Aug 1992 18:45:47 GMT
- Organization: Sun Microsystems, Inc. Mt. View, Ca.
- Lines: 30
- Message-ID: <l9q8mrINNrlp@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM>
- References: <l9mi7rINNmnd@appserv.Eng.Sun.COM>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: slovax
-
- I wrote:
- : Count me among them. Micro kernels are a crock. OS technology should be
- : simple and small, all the fun stuff is happening in user land these days.
- : ---
- : Larry McVoy (415) 336-7627 lm@sun.com
-
- I've had several messages requesting clarification on this.
-
- My point is not: do all the OS stuff in userland.
-
- My point is: OS technology is done. Do a small kernel that implements the
- useful system calls and call it quits. I think this is Linux.
-
- The comment about userland means that the interesting space is
- applications. Not OS. You can build an OS with wizzy features but
- people are not interested in wizzy features, they are interested in
- selling the most copies of McPaint. They won't use wizzy features
- unless every OS has those features. Why? Because their app won't
- port. No port == less copies sold. Less copies sold == less $.
- Everyone is motivated by $. People would like to write an app that
- works on DOS, Unix, VMS, etc, etc. Check out FrameMaker - they've
- ported to Windows. Do you think that FrameMaker will use any features
- that are unique to Unix? Not anymore.
-
- So I think projects like Linux are right on the money: make an OS that
- implements the stuff that is needed, no more. Do the simplest thing.
- Don't have a million layers and an OS source base that runs on every
- processor - that becomes a maintainence nightmare.
- ---
- Larry McVoy (415) 336-7627 lm@sun.com
-