home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!netnews.upenn.edu!uofs!prijat.cs.uofs.edu!bill
- From: bill@prijat.cs.uofs.edu (Bill Gunshannon)
- Newsgroups: comp.misc
- Subject: Re: Coherent Re: The bogus Nixpub Posting
- Message-ID: <10991@platypus.uofs.uofs.edu>
- Date: 4 Sep 92 15:47:44 GMT
- References: <BtoyMy.FwI@gator.rn.com> <aPmaqB2w164w@whitebase.ukp.com> <BtsqFJ.LEE@gator.rn.com>
- Sender: news@uofs.uofs.edu
- Organization: Department of Computing Sciences
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: prijat.cs.uofs.edu
-
- In article <BtsqFJ.LEE@gator.rn.com>, larry@gator.rn.com (Larry Snyder) writes:
- |>
- |> How about UNIX shells for DOS? These are Unix compatible -- and maybe
- |> they should be included as well.
- |>
-
- How is a "shell" UNIX compatable? UNIX is an operating system, the shell is
- merely a program that runs on top of it. If anyone out here honestly believes
- that sh|csh|ksh|tcsh are what makes UNIX the operating system it is, I think
- a refresher CS course is warranted.
-
- bill
-
- --
-
- Bill Gunshannon | If this statement wasn't here,
- bill@platypus.uofs.edu | This space would be left intentionally blank
- bill@tuatara.uofs.edu | #include <std.disclaimer.h>
-