home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #19 / NN_1992_19.iso / spool / comp / lsi / testing / 190 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-08-25  |  1.1 KB  |  32 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.lsi.testing
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!taco!thomae
  3. From: thomae@eos.ncsu.edu (DOUGLAS ALAN THOMAE)
  4. Subject: Re: Change this Group Name?
  5. Message-ID: <1992Aug25.182833.28956@ncsu.edu>
  6. Originator: thomae@boomer.csl.ncsu.edu
  7. Lines: 18
  8. Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
  9. Reply-To: thomae@eos.ncsu.edu
  10. Organization: North Carolina State University
  11. References:  <l9ko46INNls@bashful.crhc.uiuc.edu>
  12. Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1992 18:28:33 GMT
  13.  
  14.  
  15. In article <l9ko46INNls@bashful.crhc.uiuc.edu>, patel@bashful.crhc.uiuc.edu (Janak H. Patel) writes:
  16. |>I am annoyed at notes posted in this news group which have nothing to
  17. |>do with LSI or VLSI Testing.  It seems lots of news readers are
  18. [...]
  19. |>An alternate group name that doesn't contain the word "testing" would
  20. |>be better.  My suggestions are:
  21. |>
  22. |>2. comp.lsi.defects
  23. |>or
  24. |>3. comp.lsi.faults
  25. |>
  26.  
  27. ...or eliminate comp.lsi.testing entirely.  comp.lsi dosen't
  28. get that much traffic anyway, and as you've observed merely
  29. having a seperate newsgroup dosen't do much to cut down
  30. on posts that testing people are not interested in.
  31.  
  32.