home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!udel!gvls1!tredysvr!nzkites!foster
- From: foster@nzkites.UUCP (Foster Schucker)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal
- Subject: Re: Executable
- Message-ID: <H6qgqB1w164w@nzkites.UUCP>
- Date: 2 Sep 92 01:14:06 GMT
- References: <1992Aug30.161818.21319@qiclab.scn.rain.com>
- Organization: Kiteflyers Roost
- Lines: 24
-
- leonard@qiclab.scn.rain.com (Leonard Erickson) writes:
-
- > Why should I have to put up with 640x200x2 (or 320x200x4) when my hardware
- > can do 640x200x16 *and* I have the BGI to do it? Folks with superVGA
- > probably feel the same.
- >
- > And we'd *all* like to be able to eliminate the space used by the unused
- > BGI drivers.
- >
- > Oh yeah, Borland should have "suggested" an environment variable to point
- > to the directory with all your BGI files. <sigh>
-
- I love it, what a great idea!! I'm going to write to all the authors
- of the programs and suggest that they look at the "BGI" environment
- var and use that.
-
- Maybe if enough users say something then after awhile it will become
- a common practice.
-
- Thanks for the good idea!!
-
-
-
- Foster Schucker (foster@nzkites.uucp) (1-215-458-8354 (voice))
-