home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsk!att-out!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!aramis.rutgers.edu!pratt
- From: pratt@aramis.rutgers.edu (Lorien Y. Pratt)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.lisp.x
- Subject: Xlisp: robust enough for teaching a class?
- Message-ID: <Aug.31.18.22.40.1992.23982@aramis.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 31 Aug 92 22:22:40 GMT
- Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
- Lines: 14
-
- Hi,
- I've ftp'd a copy of Xlisp (version 2.1d) to my local machine and compiled
- it. I'm not sure about the status of this version of lisp, though. Can
- anybody tell me: is it ``industrial strength'' -- i.e. is it bug-free enough
- that this version would actually be used by anybody? In particular, does it
- make sense to try to teach lisp using this version (in my introductory AI
- course here at Mines)?
- Thanks.
- --Lori
- --
- L. Y. Pratt Computer Science Department
- pratt@cs.rutgers.edu Rutgers University |BIKE ,_~o
- (908) 846-4766 (home) Hill Center | TO _-\_<,
- (908) 932-4974 (CoRE building office)New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA |WORK (*)/'(*)
-