home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!redwood.CS.Berkeley.EDU!jhauser
- From: jhauser@redwood.CS.Berkeley.EDU (John Hauser)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
- Subject: Re: Ignoring Least Significant Bit in a Real Compare
- Date: 25 Aug 1992 23:59:54 GMT
- Organization: University of California at Berkeley
- Lines: 10
- Message-ID: <17ehhqINN1ml@agate.berkeley.edu>
- References: <1992Aug21.203055.29668@aero.org> <1992Aug21.212225.2961@news.eng.convex.com> <92234.181300HDK@psuvm.psu.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: redwood.cs.berkeley.edu
-
- In article <92234.181300HDK@psuvm.psu.edu> HDK@psuvm.psu.edu (H. D. Knoble) writes:
- >Similarly when computing the greatest
- >integer less than or equal to an argument X, one would not want for
- >example, 1 for FLOOR(X=1.999999999999999).
-
- Speak for yourself. This ``one'' prefers FLOOR(1.999999999999999) = 1.
-
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Boycott redwood. Boycott Louisiana-Pacific. Keep the forests. YYYYYYYYYYY
- John Hauser---jhauser@cs.berkeley.edu YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
-