home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!lucid.com!lucid.com!jss
- From: jss@lucid.com (Jerry Schwarz)
- Subject: Re: GOTO, was: Tiny proposal for na
- Message-ID: <1992Sep2.215323.4560@lucid.com>
- Sender: usenet@lucid.com
- Reply-To: jss@lucid.com (Jerry Schwarz)
- Organization: Lucid, Inc.
- References: <714668024@thor> <6800007@tisdec.tis.tandy.com> <1992Aug26.130335.26725@hemlock.cray.com> <1992Aug26.194538.1598@spss.com> <rmartin.714931485@thor> <1992Sep1.192043.16224@mksol.dseg.ti.com> <rmartin.715445973@thor>
- Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 21:53:23 GMT
- Lines: 12
-
- I find this whole discussion of GOTO in comp.lang.c++ somewhat
- quaint. Perhaps it should be moved to comp.lang.c.
-
- If we've learned anything in the past 20 years, it is that
- that the way you write your code within a function is much
- less important than the way you structure your functions and
- types. The distinctive features of C++ (member functions,
- inheritance, ...) are concerned with global structure and
- not the local structure of functions.
-
- -- Jerry Schwarz
-
-