home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Path: sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jimad
- From: jimad@microsoft.com (Jim Adcock)
- Subject: Re: destruction of temporaries
- Message-ID: <1992Aug25.175751.8117@microsoft.com>
- Date: 25 Aug 92 17:57:51 GMT
- Organization: Microsoft Corporation
- References: <3920@starlab.UUCP> <23487@alice.att.com> <MATT.92Aug19170229@physics16.berkeley.edu>
- Lines: 10
-
- In article <MATT.92Aug19170229@physics16.berkeley.edu> matt@physics.berkeley.edu writes:
- |Unfortunately, it really isn't at all clear to me that garbage
- |collection and C++ can be made to go together very well. Naively, it
- |seems to me that high-quality garbage collection would be a bigger
- |change to the language than high-quality exception handling.
-
- Implementation-wise they amount to about the same thing -- the hard part
- is changing a compiler's knowledge of the stack so that it is known at
- runtime when what objects where on the stack are alive or not.
-
-