home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
- Path: sparky!uunet!ftpbox!mothost!lmpsbbs!mcil.comm.mot.com!davidk
- From: davidk@mcil.comm.mot.com (David Kramer)
- Subject: Re: Perry & Kaiser article (was: Ada 9x Dispatching Question)
- Organization: Motorola Communications Israel Ltd., Tel Aviv
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 07:25:41 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Aug27.072541.21153@lmpsbbs.comm.mot.com>
- Keywords: Ada Dispatching Polymorphism
- References: <9223120.6784@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <1992Aug21.145044.5567@inmet.camb.inmet.com> <9223503.26777@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <1992Aug25.160540.21034@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
- Sender: davidk@comm.mot.com (David Kramer)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 145.9.71.22
- Lines: 17
-
- In article <1992Aug25.160540.21034@inmet.camb.inmet.com>, stt@spock.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) writes:
-
- |> You might want to try to find an interesting article by DeWayne
- |> Perry in an old issue of JOOP (I am afraid I have lost the
- |> full reference -- perhaps some other newsey remembers?) that
- |> described the issue of testing a system built using inheritance.
-
- The article appeared in JOOP Jan/Feb 1990, and is entitled "Adequate
- Testing and Object Oriented Programming".
-
- As a side note, I believe that when dealing with single inheritance
- and with full data encapsulation an inherited operation
- does not have to be retested in the derived class as long as that
- operation doesn't invoke operations overiden by the derived class.
-
- --
- [ David Kramer INTERNET: davidk@mcil.comm.mot.com ]
-