home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!rutgers!cmcl2!psinntp!psinntp!crynwr!nelson
- From: nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)
- Newsgroups: comp.emacs
- Subject: MicroEMACS vs Freemacs.
- Message-ID: <714924187snx@crynwr.com>
- Date: 27 Aug 92 14:03:07 GMT
- References: <DEAN.92Aug26174026@world.std.com>
- Organization: Crynwr Software
- Lines: 10
-
- In article <DEAN.92Aug26174026@world.std.com> dean@world.std.com writes:
-
- Please tell me, what is the difference between the GNU recommended Freemacs
- Russell Nelson and MicroEMACS? Is MicroEMACS better? It gets quite a bit more
- attention here on the newsgroup listings.
-
- Freemacs is more compatible with GNU Emacs, and only edits files <
- 64K. MicroEMACS edits files that will fit in memory. MicroEMACS is
- written in C and is portable to Unix. Freemacs is written in .ASM.
-
- -russ <nelson@crynwr.com> I'm proud to be a humble Quaker!
- Crynwr Software Crynwr Software sells packet driver support.
- 11 Grant St. 315-268-1925 Voice
- Potsdam, NY 13676 315-268-9201 FAX
-