home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.edu:1487 comp.lang.fortran:3381 comp.lang.misc:2892
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!decwrl!concert!aurs01!throop
- From: throop@aurs01.UUCP (Wayne Throop)
- Newsgroups: comp.edu,comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.misc
- Subject: sagans of lines of Fortran?
- Message-ID: <61115@aurs01.UUCP>
- Date: 2 Sep 92 18:32:13 GMT
- References: <1992Sep2.085256@trc.amoco.com>
- Sender: news@aurs01.UUCP
- Lines: 29
-
- > From: zkdc05@trc.amoco.com (Kelly D. Crawford)
- > With trillions of lines of existing Fortran in the scientific
- > marketplace, it is a travesty not to teach CS students Fortran sometime
- > during their education.
-
- Let's see... assume Fortran emitted at a furious continuous pace
- of 1000 lines/day, every day since 1960, and we get
-
- 1e12 loc
- divide 1e3 loc/developer-day = 1e9 developer-days
- divide 365 days/year ~= 2739726 developer-years
- divide 32 years (since 1960) ~= 85616 developers
-
- or about 86 thousand Fortran-coding speed-demons continuously
- employed since 1960 for every trillion of those trillions of lines.
-
- Impressive.
-
- ( Yes, Kelly was probably being hyperbolistic... )
-
- On a more serious note, I tend to disagree that Fortran should
- necessarily be taught to all CS students. It depends strongly
- what those CS students intend to specialize in. Certainly
- bit bummers, toolsmiths, graphics gurus and other specialties
- would find Fortran relatively useless. Certainly we don't teach
- our electrical engineers all about the properties of concrete,
- nor find it a travesty that this is not done.
-
- Wayne Throop ...!mcnc!aurgate!throop
-