home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!ucla-se!boole!jong
- From: jong@boole.seas.ucla.edu (Jong Y. Lee)
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: 16550 vs. 16550AFN
- Message-ID: <7949@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU>
- Date: 30 Aug 92 08:55:04 GMT
- References: <BtIDJ1.Ex2@animal.gcs.co.nz> <7926@lee.SEAS.UCLA.EDU> <Btnw8I.55H@animal.gcs.co.nz>
- Sender: news@SEAS.UCLA.EDU
- Organization: SEASnet, University of California, Los Angeles
- Lines: 20
-
-
-
- In article <Btnw8I.55H@animal.gcs.co.nz> lchiu@animal.gcs.co.nz (Laurence Chiu) writes:
- >
- >Yes I do have caching on. I use the 3.1 smartdrv with 2M of cache. I turned
- >off write caching since I was a little worried about that. Perhaps your
- >drives are not fast enough? I use 17ms Seagate IDE drives (1144A and 3144A)
- >
- >Laurence Chiu
-
-
- That's strange. That's the exact cache program I'm using with the same amount
- of cache. And I never got more than 1300cps with cache on. So I just do
- smartdrv c- to turn off cache on drive c: entirely. Anyway, I'm using
- Maxtor 7120A and 7080A whose avg. access times are supposed to be
- 15ms and 18ms, respectively. But I get around 11-12ms with sysinfo program
- from Norton Unility which isn't bad at all.
-
- Jongyoon
-
-