home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans.ethernet
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!str-ccsun!ccsun.strath.ac.uk!craa85
- From: craa85@ccsun.strath.ac.uk ( D.W.Stevenson)
- Subject: Re: Ethernet Analyzer/testing devices/software
- Message-ID: <1992Aug28.094847.17582@ccsun.strath.ac.uk>
- Sender: news@ccsun.strath.ac.uk (News account )
- Nntp-Posting-Host: coll
- Organization: University of Strathclyde
- References: <BtLJq0.D71@world.std.com> <1992Aug27.090801.11847@ccsun.strath.ac.uk> <aycn82=@quantum.on.ca>
- Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1992 09:48:47 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <aycn82=@quantum.on.ca>, aboyd@quantum.on.ca (Andrew Boyd) writes:
- |> In article <1992Aug27.090801.11847@ccsun.strath.ac.uk>
- |> craa85@ccsun.strath.ac.uk ( D.W.Stevenson) writes:
- |> >the PC bus is far too slow to transfer packets to main memory at 10Mbit/s
- |>
- |> um, this is not quite correct. Even using the lowly 8mhz bus, a 16-bit
- |> ISA card can keep up with a 10Mbit/sec throughput.
-
-
- The raw bit rate is certainly fast enough to cope with 10Mbit/s, but don't
- forget that the PC has to access other peripherals such as the video card
- and hard disk controller over the same bus, which takes large
- chunks out of the available bus bandwidth. In a previous job,
- I was the engineer who designed the hardware for the Spider
- Analyser (or TTC Netlens as it is now) and it just
- isn't possible to do all the things that need to be done on the bus and transfer
- packets at full rate of Ethernet across the bus. The achievable transfer rate
- is however quite adequate for all but the most unusual of circumstances.
-
-
- Dave Stevenson D.W.Stevenson@strath.ac.uk
- Computer Centre Communications Tel : 041-552 4400 x3461
- University of Strathclyde
- Glasgow, U.K.
-