home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dtix!darwin.sura.net!wupost!monsanto.com!bb1t.monsanto.com!skcla.monsanto.com!jjfink
- From: jjfink@skcla.monsanto.com
- Newsgroups: comp.databases
- Subject: Re: FoxPro vs Paradox
- Message-ID: <1992Aug27.110555.1@skcla.monsanto.com>
- Date: 27 Aug 92 11:05:55 GMT
- References: <1992Aug24.190545.28971@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>
- Organization: Searle, Skokie, IL
- Lines: 70
- Nntp-Posting-Host: skca9
- Nntp-Posting-User: jjfink
-
- In article <1992Aug24.190545.28971@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov>, baalke@kelvin.jpl.nasa.gov (Ron Baalke) writes:
- > I've justed received from Borland an offer for Paradox 4.0 for $200.
- > It will retail for $795. They also included literature saying how
- > much better and faster Paradox 4.0 is over FoxPro 2.0. I would like
- > to see a comparison of these two products from a more objective source.
- > Anyone care to comment?
-
- Paradox and FoxPro use COMPLETELY different programming paradigms.
- It's kind of an apples to oranges situation.
-
- This graph may help. The X axis is complexity of the project you need to
- create on your database system, the Y axis is the amount of work.
- xx
- | xx
- | xx oooo x = Paradox
- | x oooo o = FoxPro
- | x oooo
- | xoooo
- | oooo
- |oooo x
- | x
- |xxxxx
- |
- +------------------------
- a b c
-
- Paradox seems much easier to get a simple database together, including
- relations, multiuser access, complex forms, etc. This would be region (a)
- above. Region (c) is where things get out of hand with Paradox. Past the
- level where you can do everything with their forms and reports, you've got a
- LOT of work to do. I've not had a chance to do anything with 4.0, but if the
- standard keyboard handling is not enough in version 3.5, you must handle
- everything yourself (their DEToolkit is a steop in the right direction, but
- very cumbersome).
-
- Advantages for Paradox:
- Complex forms involving multiple tables are easier, so long as there
- is only a single level of link: I.e. customer to PO, customer to
- salesperson and customer to store can all be done on one form, but
- customer to store to region can't be shown easily.
-
- Forms with multiple records per screen are easier in Paradox. You
- have the option of scrolling areas with multiple lines per record,
- which is impossible in Fox. In Fox you must use BROWSE windows,
- which are spreadsheet-like, with only one line per record.
-
- Paradox handles keyboard activity for navigating around your records.
- There is no such default in FoxPro
-
- Advantages for FoxPRO
- The SELECT and FILTER statements let you limit the data you are working
- with on-screen, without generating sub-tables, as in Paradox.
-
- The SET RELATION command allows more flexible linking between
- relations. Paradox does not permit on-screen (Form) relations except
- by entire fields. You can not use a calculation or variable to link
- relations in Paradox, without creating a query and a subtable.
-
- The Report Writer is more easily controlled by programming.
-
- If you switch from one to the other, you will find things you love and things
- you hate. There are ways around just about everything, but you have to be able
- to think differently.
-
- Joel
- --
- jjfink@skcla.monsanto.com
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- "Portions of the preceding were recorded. As for the rest, I quite fear that
- it was all in your mind" -- Alfred Hitchcock
-