NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #19/NN_1992_19.iso/spool/bit/listserv/sasl/4041

Text File | 1992-09-03 | 5.9 KB | 136 lines

Comments: Gated by [e-mail]
Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!LEICESTER.AC.UK!MAIL_SYSTEM
Via: uk.ac.leicester; Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:19:36 +0100
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:19:00 BST
Reply-To:     [e-mail]
Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <[e-mail]>
From:         [e-mail]
Subject:      %% Undelivered Mail %%
Comments: To: SAS-L <[e-mail]>
Lines: 122

Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  16:19 BST
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <[e-mail]>;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:11:37 +0100
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 9575; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:10:33 EDT
Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
          with BSMTP id 1705; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:10:04 EDT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:07:00 BST
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <[e-mail]2>
From: [e-mail]
Subject: %% Undelivered Mail %%
Comments: To: SAS-L <[e-mail]>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <[e-mail]2>
Sender: [e-mail]2

Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  16:07 BST
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <[e-mail]>;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:07:18 +0100
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 9530; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:06:17 EDT
Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
          with BSMTP id 1358; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:06:08 EDT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:03:00 BST
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <[e-mail]2>
From: [e-mail]
Subject: %% Undelivered Mail %%
Comments: To: SAS-L <[e-mail]>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <[e-mail]2>
Sender: [e-mail]2

Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  16:03 BST
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <[e-mail]>;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:02:59 +0100
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 9480; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:01:52 EDT
Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
          with BSMTP id 0965; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:01:30 EDT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 15:19:00 BST
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <[e-mail]2>
From: [e-mail]
Subject: %% Undelivered Mail %%
Comments: To: SAS-L <[e-mail]>
To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <[e-mail]2>
Sender: [e-mail]2

Your mail was not delivered as follows:
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'

Your original mail header and message follow.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  15:19 BST
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
          id <[e-mail]>;
          Thu, 3 Sep 1992 15:18:24 +0100
Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
          id 9228; Thu, 03 Sep 92 10:16:05 EDT
Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
          with BSMTP id 9245; Thu, 03 Sep 92 10:16:04 EDT
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 10:08:02 EDT
Reply-To: Howard Schreier <[e-mail]2>
Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <[e-mail]2>
From: Howard Schreier <[e-mail]2>
Subject: WHERE & FIRSTOBS
To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <[e-mail]2>
Sender: [e-mail]2

CONTENT:  Comment
SUMMARY:  SQL WHERE and global SAS WHERE not same thing
REL/PLTF: 6.06+

> In all procs WHERE and OBS/FIRSTOBS are mutually exclusive.
> HOWEVER, look at the PROC SQL <options>; there is one to
> control the number of observations (I think) and the number
> of loops (essentially a "govenor" of sorts).

But,  the  SQL  WHERE  clause  and  the  SAS  WHERE  feature
(implemented  both  as a statement and as a data set option)
are two different things which just happen to share a name.

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\   Howard Schreier, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington    /
/                     MVS 5.18 & 6.07                      \
\   Voice: [phone]        BITNET: HIS@NIHCU         /
/   Fax:   [phone]      INTERNET: [e-mail]    \
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
End of returned mail

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
End of returned mail

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
End of returned mail

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
End of returned mail