home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ASUACAD.BITNET!IACDES
- Message-ID: <MBU-L%92083022393036@TTUVM1.BITNET>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mbu-l
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 1992 22:39:30 --500
- Sender: "Megabyte University (Computers & Writing)" <MBU-L@TTUVM1.BITNET>
- From: "David E. Schwalm" <IACDES@ASUACAD.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: (Fwd: *C&CD*) Some classes where groups have worked (4)
- Lines: 22
-
- *** Reply to note of 08/30/92 13:28
- Myles, I once argued (in a old lit/comp skirmish a few years back) that the
- reason we analyze literature is that there is nothing else to do with
- it--except enjoy it, of course, and that has no academic pizzazz. THe only
- life situation one can think of for writing about literature is an English
- class, and our stu dents have been in that situation often enough. Interesting
- problem. It's almost pathelogical to read literature for information, and
- since we no longer believe in universals and stuff like that the higher
- function of literature that Aristotle identified is severely eroded. (And
- should be, I suspect. As I get older, fewer and fewer literary works seem to
- offer much insight. Only a few, like Rasselas seem to hold up at all. I just
- want to tell Keats and Shelley to grow up.) So what are we left with? Literary
- analysis. Why is it that we spend inordinate amounts of time teaching students
- how to read literature with great acumen and almost no time teaching them how
- to read a newspaper or textbook? We teach people how to read texts that admit
- to being lies (fiction); we do not teach them how to read the texts that claim
- to be true. Talk about your screwy values.
-
- -- David E. Schwalm, Assoc. Provost for Academic Programs
- ___Arizona State University West
- ___4701 West Thunderbird Rd.
- ___Phoenix, AZ 85069-7100___(602) 543-4500
-