home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MCIMAIL.COM!0004742580
- Message-ID: <93920903191739/0004742580NA2EM@mcimail.com>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 19:17:00 GMT
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: Dag Forssell <0004742580@MCIMAIL.COM>
- Subject: Deja vu, PCT promotion
- Lines: 85
-
- [From Dag Forssell (920903-2)]
-
- Rick Marken (920803.0930)
-
- >What is it about PCT? Why don't people like it? Why do they prefer
- >trendy junk (Chapman, Turvey, Brooks, etc) to solid quality (Powers)?
- >Is there something wrong with PCT? Or is it the influence of network TV?
-
- There is nothing wrong with PCT, except that it lives up to the standards
- of a hard, explanatory science.
-
- It compares to physics (Bill's background), chemistry, engineering, and
- such, which are explanatory and predictive with expectations of 100%
- correlation between science and results in the real world.
-
- It is hard to comprehend for people thoroughly trained in the soft,
- descriptive sciences, which explain little and predict even less. You can
- tell the soft, descriptive sciences by the suffix science, as in science
- of psychology, life science, social science.
-
- You are one of the very few psychologists who have demanded that the
- science of psychology should have something useful to say about the
- practice of psychology. You are one of the very few who likes to think
- for yourself based on the evidence, instead of conveniently accepting
- what your teachers told you and what the abundant literature of the
- prestigious association tells you.
-
- You rant and rave against people who have another world view than you do.
- People who cannot perceive the inconsistencies you see and are not
- disturbed by the lack of clarity and application in what they "research."
- They have different systems concepts and are happy where they are.
-
- You edited American Behavioral Scientist, from Sage Publications,
- Thousand Oaks, Ca, Volume 34 / Number 1, devoted to:
-
- PURPOSEFUL BEHAVIOR: The Control Theory Approach.
-
- I was reading it recently, and came across the following in Phil Runkel's
- article on: Research Method for Control Theory:
-
- .....Most psychological research, for example, does not assume the
- circular causation specified in Postulate 4; it assumes linear,
- input-output causation. I once sent a diagram of the input- output
- metatheory to 16 psychologists, asking whether they thought it was a fair
- representation of the theory underlying method in psychological research.
- Most of them gave me offhand answers such as "Looks OK to me." Four of
- the 16 wrote comments to the effect of "Method? I don't think about
- method; I just do research."..........
-
- So when you say:
-
- >What is it about PCT? Why don't people like it? Why do they prefer
-
- you know the answer. People will like it, and do. You have to consider
- who you approach with this marvelous answer to the prayer of many people
- who are troubled and need a better understanding.
-
- Address groups and professions where people are used to hard,
- explanatory, predictive thinking that have problems PCT can help them
- solve. Show them the theory in all its glory, but start with some aspect
- they can use right away, or they may not see the relevance and maintain
- interest.
-
- Address groups where people can use more "common sense" common sense in
- their personal relations with Ed Ford's narrative approach and superb
- counseling book: FREEDOM FROM STRESS. Brandt publishing, Scottsdale Az
- (602) 991-4860
-
- Stop worrying about the 1/10 of 1% who are already thoroughly trained in
- the science of psychology and whose prestige is wrapped up in defending
- what they already think they know, their school, teachers etc..
-
- Approach the other 99.9% in the way PCT tells you to. Find and address
- people's error signals.
-
- As you well know, there are three ways to solve a conflict.
-
- 1) Change what you do.
- 2) Change what you want.
- 3) Change your choice of perception.
-
- You can change your want in terms of people you want to convert.
- You can of course continue on course, if you enjoy and want to rant.
-
- All the best, Dag
-