home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news
- From: dougmc@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Doug McLaren)
- Subject: Re: "Gender Flags" -- for lack of a better term.
- Organization: Doug's House of Disco
- References: <9208260030.AA14936@moeng2.morgan.edu> <BtMHCD.Ip@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Message-ID: <1992Aug27.034038.10119@ctr.columbia.edu>
- Sender: news@ctr.columbia.edu (The Daily Lose)
- Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1992 03:40:38 GMT
- X-Posted-From: dopey.cc.utexas.edu
- X-Posted-Through: sol.ctr.columbia.edu
- Lines: 24
-
- Oh come on ... why do we need gender flags ?
-
- Why don't we have preference flags too ? Hell, we could have things like :
-
- @*HSWMHUSV - VT100 terminal
- ||||||||\- Sun Sparcstatio
- |||||||\- Unix
- ||||||\- Horny
- |||||\- Male
- ||||\- White
- |||\- Single
- \\\- the old standbys ...
-
-
- I don't see any reason to do this sort of thing, unless we want to replace
- IRC with Internet Dial-Your-Match #69 ...
-
- If you really feel the need for people to know that you're female, I think
- (female) in your name field would do it :) (if you LIKE getting messaged by
- 50 horny guys ...)
- --
- The opinions stated above are mine (and quite possibly mine alone!) However,
- for a brief time, and a nominal fee, they can be yours too. Operators are
- standing by! Call Now! DouG McLareN, dougmc@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu, DemoN on IRC.
-