home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!mucs!db.mcc.ac.uk!zlsiida
- From: zlsiida@fs1.mcc.ac.uk (dave budd)
- Newsgroups: talk.philosophy.misc
- Subject: Re: free will
- Message-ID: <zlsiida.87@fs1.mcc.ac.uk>
- Date: 13 Aug 92 09:36:57 GMT
- References: <1992Aug7.203349.19645@cis.umassd.edu> <14910003@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM>
- Sender: news@cs.man.ac.uk
- Organization: Manchester Computing Centre
- Lines: 26
- Originator: netnews@uts.mcc.ac.uk
-
- In article <14910003@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM> ric@hpspdla.spd.HP.COM (Ric Peregrino) writes:
-
-
- >Dave Budd writes:
-
- >>Neither do I have to know the laws of physics to make them deterministic.
- >>They either are or they aren't. My knowledge, and yours, is irrelevant.
-
- >Certainly your statement that the physics is either deterministic or
- >not is obvious. This could be applied to anything. But I disagree that our
- >knowledge of the fact is irrelevant. It has consequences on the experimental
- >verification of the fact. For instance, say there is determinism. But say
- >that some particles can go at infinite velocity and say that there are an
- >infinite number of these particles in the universe, then there is no way
- >to make a prediction. Thus I can't prove to you that you have no free will
- >by confronting you with a choice that you have no choice but to make.
-
- I didn't mean irrelevant to us - I meant that any knowledge or ignorance of
- the laws of physics doen't affect what those laws are.
- Some philosophers will probably be able to argue about that......
-
- +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | The trouble with having an open mind is that people come along and |
- | put things in it. {attribution? I nicked it from Readers Digest} |
- | Dave Budd, MCC, Oxford Rd, Manchester, England (44)061-275-6033 |
- +---------------------------------------------------------------------+
-