home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!timbuk.cray.com!hemlock.cray.com!mon
- From: mon@cray.com (Muriel Nelson)
- Subject: Re: The Nurturing Network 1-800-TNN-4MOM
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.121846.14892@hemlock.cray.com>
- Lines: 176
- References: <91ayc5f@rpi.edu> <1992Aug20.201657.10445@noao.edu>
- Date: 21 Aug 92 12:18:46 CDT
-
- [LONG]
- In article <1992Aug20.201657.10445@noao.edu> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
- >From article <91ayc5f@rpi.edu>, by cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker):
- >> forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach) writes:
- >>
- >>>From article <92215.152601ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>, by Linda Birmingham <ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca>:
- >>>>
- >>>> While the majority of the quotes are Canadian, I am
- >>>> sure Ms. Forgach if you did a little reading on the
- >>>> topic you will find that feminist organizations
- >>>> around the world have been lobbying and funding
- >>>> such initiatives as you described above.
- >>
- >>>No, Linda. They've been talking the talk, but they haven't been
- >>>walking the walk. Walk into ANY, and I mean ANY abortion alternative
- >>>organization ANYWHERE, and you will not find even one pro-"choicer" among
- >>>them. It always has been and always will be the pro-lifers who provide any
- >>>non-abortive help to pregnant women in trouble.
- >>
- >> Then you are calling me a liar, Ms. Forgach.
- >
- >Could be. In your entire story below, you neglected to give any indication
- >of even what YEAR it takes place. Makes a big difference. Movements mature.
-
- Suzanne, this is uncalled for. We both know that Cathi's kid
- is just a tot. How long ago _could_ it be?
-
- >So tell me, was it a simple oversight, or a lie by ommission? You also make it
-
- The rocker is not a liar, Suzanne. Could it be that you are
- embarrassed for the failings of your own side, and taking it
- out on Cathi? I'm disappointed in you, Ms. Compassion for
- Mothers in Need.
-
- >clear that you _never_ actually asked an abortion alternative agency for help!
- >You simply got into one 10 minute discussion with some Right-To-Life debators
- >at a campus abortion debate. Hardly the way to seriously seek prenatal aid,
- >Cathi.
- >
- When one group of 'pro-life' folk had treated her so shabbily,
- why on earth would Cathi go looking for more?
-
- Gag me with a Forgach.
- >
- >> I have posted many
- >> times that when _I_ was facing a crisis pregnancy, I went to a debate
- >> that featured the president of the local RTL chapter in a large city.
- >> I approached him, and other pro-"life" people after the debate, asking
- >> about where I might obtain pregnancy help. Since I had identified
- >> myself as pro-choice, they were all quite eager to do their Good Deed
- >> for the day and "talk me out of getting an abortion". Fairly
- >> ridiculous, as I was about five months at the time and showing quite
- >> a bit. When I told them I had no intention of having an abortion,
- >> they eagerly began telling me about adoption agencies in the area.
- >> When I informed them that I was most certainly NOT considering adoption,
- >> they completely lost interest, to the point of wandering away. When
- >> I asked again about pregnancy help (after following them), the most
- >> concrete answer I received was "Well, you might try your church."
- >> They didn't bother to ask if I attended church, and they ignored me
- >> thereafter.
- >
- >
- >You might have tried the yellow pages for the local abortion altnerative
- >agencies. Surely you use yellow pages all the time. Debators at a campus
- >debate is weird place to look for prenatal help. I think you went with a
- >chip on your shoulder already. Looking for a fight.
- >
- A posture you're _real_ familiar with, dear. Why can't
- you accept rocker's word that she sought help and was
- turned away?
- >
- >> I must say, I was a bit stricken by this. A member of NOW noticed
- >> me standing by myself,
- >
- >Obviously Cathi, she'd already eavesdropped on your entire conversation.
- >She approached you entirely aware of what had just gone on and decided to
- >turn the situation to her advantage - recruiting you into activism.
- >
- >She played you like a fiddle, Cathi.
- >
- You're assuming a lot here, Suzanne. I don't think Cathi
- is nearly that stupid. Besides, I've never heard you
- accuse NOW of recruiting members by helping mothers in
- need with the necessities to choose to carry to term before.
- Quite the opposite. Make up your uh, mind.
- >
- >
- >> and walked up and congratulated me on my
- >> pregnancy. I began confiding in her about the trouble I was having,
- >> and was soon surrounded by a sympathetic crowd of feminists. One
- >> quickly offered baby furniture and clothes, others began telling me
- >> about medical care available. They offered phone numbers and advice.
- >> One NOW member even bent the rules of a local congressman's phone
- >> bank to allow me to make the calls from home after my child was born,
- >> thus providing me with a crucial source of income at a time when I
- >> was unable to work elsewhere. All the local NOW members I met, from
- >> grandmothers to lesbians, were a constant source of support to me
- >> at a difficult time. Not a single one ever questioned my decision
- >> to give birth.
- >
- >Not to your face, of course not, but many of them had aborted their own
- >children under even less difficult circumstances.
- >
- Their own reproductive history has little to do with the
- quality of support they offer to other women, Suzanne.
- Is this usual Christian behavior, impugning the motives
- of folk you don't even know?
- >
- >> I have questioned Bill Overpeck and others who say they are associated
- >> with crisis-type pregnancy centers, none of them address the common
- >> problems that I and many other women face during our pregnancies.
- >
- >The Nurturing Network addresses ALL of them. All of the common problems
- >and all of the unique problems. Other agencies do as well. Write to me
- >and I will give you agencies that do.
- >
- I don't think rocker needs prenatal care at the moment.
- Unless she's been keepin' secrets.
- >
- >> The number one problem is the exorbitant cost of prenatal care and
- >> giving birth. (One local hospital told me on the phone "We require a
- >> deposit of $2300. cash before you enter the ninth month, or we will
- >> be unable to admit you." In an irritable mood that day, I replied
- >> "So if I don't cough up the cash, I can have the baby on the sidewalk
- >> for all you care." She answered "Oh, we don't say THAT....". Yes
- >> you do, you just use nicer words.) The main "services" these places
- >> seem to offer is a place to stay during pregnancy and adoption
- >> referrals. I would hazard a guess that this is not what most women
- >> want or need.
- >
- >The Nurturing Network will provide you all this, Cathi, for your prenatal
- >care AND your delivery. That was _why_ I posted about them. 1-800-TNN-4MOM
- >will put you in touch with a local doctor, in YOUR TOWN, who regularly donates
- >his services to such women.
- >
- I _hope_ this service is universally available. Gee, I
- got prenatal and delivery on my first one for $250.
- Good old days, and all that.
- >
- >> I had always been pro-choice, _this_ experience made me an activist.
- >
- >So that more women would be able to kill their babies that YOUR OWN baby was
- >too precious to kill. Mighty big of you, Cathi. Why don't you just work
- >for an abortion alternative center instead, filling in any gaps where you
- >see them lacking instead.
- >
- We'll leave that to you, Suzanne. Sometimes when
- a woman takes the very difficult route of carrying
- a badly-timed or threatened pregnancy to term, and
- lives with all the consequences, she's very grateful
- that she did so by choice, not by force, and wants
- to see that no other woman ever faces that situation
- without a choice.
- >
- >>>> The
- >>>> main difference is that the feminist groups want
- >>>> to see this provided to all women in society, not
- >>>> just those able to meet the requirements of
- >>>> organizations that may or may not be operating
- >>>> in their area.
- >>
- >> Amen.
- >
- >Being simply a woman in need does not appear to be too stringent a requirement
- >at all.
- >
- >
- Please. Are you sure that the network of support is
- in place for all women in America? If so, you can
- get started on the rest of the world. If you'd like to
- take care of hunger and clean water while you're about
- it, I'll send a donation. See you in 20 years.
-
- muriel
- standard disclaimer
-
-