home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!convex!news.oc.com!spssig.spss.com!uchinews!machine!chinet!katefans
- From: katefans@chinet.chi.il.us (Chris'n'Vickie of Chicago)
- Subject: Re: STOP THE TERRORISTS!!!
- Message-ID: <Bt9IKz.Mq0@chinet.chi.il.us>
- Organization: Chinet - Public Access UNIX
- References: <Bt5srz.EGw@chinet.chi.il.us> <1992Aug19.030500.28053@s1.gov>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 03:19:47 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- In article <1992Aug19.030500.28053@s1.gov> lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich) writes:
- >
- > Read the July/August 1992 _Humanist_; it has a cover story of
- >how some pro-choice activists defended the Buffalo clinics earlier
- >this year.
-
- Thanks for this information.
-
- > They would be good people to talk to :-)
- >
- > Also, a group like NARAL, the National Abortion Rights Action
- >League.
- >
- > Pro-choice people have managed to get legal injunctions
- >against anti-abortion terrorists in some places.
- >
- > I recently read of some such characters going to jail
- >somewhere in Florida.
-
- Glad to hear it!
-
- Vickie
- Anto-abortion, Pro-adoption, Pro-birth control, Pro-sex education, Pro-life*
-
- *** PRO-CHOICE *** *** PRO-CHOICE *** *** PRO-CHOICE ***
-
- * Pro, adv. in favor of; n. affirmative side [...]
- Yep, I'm pro-life alright! I think all Pro-choicers are too. The anti-choicers
- don't (or shouldn't) have a monopoly on this phrase. (Anymore!)
-