home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!Cadence.COM!phz
- From: phz@cadence.com (Pete Zakel)
- Subject: Another good reason to vote for Bush ... NOT!
- Message-ID: <1992Aug19.214911.10266@Cadence.COM>
- Sender: usenet@Cadence.COM (Usenet News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cds709.cadence.com
- Organization: Cadence Design Systems
- References: <1992Aug12.163353.6443@ncsu.edu> <1992Aug13.055602.11940@leland.Stanford.EDU> <1992Aug13.172501.20238@ncsu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 21:49:11 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Aug13.172501.20238@ncsu.edu> dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >I think you should be ashamed of yourself for insinuating that
- >all women think alike. Many women are pro-life. Only a sexist
- >would mistakenly believe that all women are pro-choice.
-
- Yes, but the pro-choice position allows pro-life women not to have abortions.
-
- The "pro-life" position would not allow *any* woman to have an abortion
- (except for the "compromise" pro-life position which allows certain exceptions
- for rape, incest and/or health risk to the pregnant woman).
-
- Pro-choice encompasses ALL women. "Pro-life" does not.
-
- Try hard, Dougie, and maybe you can get that beam out of your eye.
-
- (Not to mention that both Quaylee and Shrub ... er, Bush have said they are
- basically pro-choice when it comes to daughter and grand-daughter
- respectively.)
-
- -Pete Zakel
- (phz@cadence.com or ..!uunet!cadence!phz)
-
- You should never wear your best trousers when you go out to fight for
- freedom and liberty.
- -- Henrick Ibson
-