home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!coopsol!gordons
- From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
- Subject: Re: Happy Anniversary! (Four days and counting)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug17.174204.6949@coopsol.com>
- Organization: Stay Awake Software
- References: <1992Aug12.215027.1814@csus.edu> <yd6mlza.gordons@netcom.com> <1992Aug15.232244.14853@csus.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Aug 92 17:42:04 GMT
- Lines: 73
-
- <1992Aug15.232244.14853@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) :
- >In article <yd6mlza.gordons@netcom.com> gordons@netcom.com (Gordon Storga) :
- >><1992Aug12.215027.1814@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney):
- >>><1992Aug11.181819.9370@coopsol.com> gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga) :
- >>>><1992Aug10.171155.7841@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) :
- ...
- >>>>>And none'ya have been able to remove me yet,
- >>>>...
- >>>>Kinda like a barnacle. Seriously, has someone *really* tried to get your
- >>>>net access removed? Do you have proof of this accusation? Isn't true
- >>>>that you think it was wonderful that Dan Bredy lost his net access? And
- >>>>now you are whining that you think someone tried to remove yours.
- >>>
- >>>Susan Garvin?
- >>
- >>I see a name. I don't see any *proof*.
- >
- >She tried to complain about my having posted and twisted her name and
- >substituting it with mine, as a joke. Even as though my system admins
- >tossed it out and went on with business as usual.
-
- You buffoon. Why do you continue to pretend? Susan didn't contact your
- sysadmins. She contacted *her* sysadmins. They apparently contacted yours
- and asked that you *stop doctoring posts*, not that you have your access
- removed.
-
- >>>Well, as for the others, I wouldn't say they wanted my access removed;
- >>
- >>Then why did you imply above that they were trying to do so?
- >
- >I was implying that they were harassing myself and CSUS in general
- >about their Dennis Hall prank, and Scott Roby said in his letter that
- >he wanted to urge CSUS system admins to take direct action against me.
-
- Nope, you implied that they all tried to get your access pulled. Why else
- did you crow about still being around and that they had failed? And Scott
- Roby only asked that you stop posting as two different people.
-
- >Well, maybe I was wrong: he couldn't do it because I never posted as
- >DH so I couldn't be messed with by him. But the threat sure looked
- >serious enough to me, so I am justified in saying that he was trying
- >to get my net.access compromised, if not taken away.
-
- In your own little mind, but the fact that you also believe you are/were a
- fighter plane and an inhuman alien race doesn't speak well for your
- "justification".
-
- ...
- >>> Pro-Choice means pro-adult/child sex!
- >>> With the little girl's consent, of course.
- >>
- >>Poor Steve, not even aware that a growing number of child molestations are
- >>being perpetrated on young boys (see "Catholic Priest").
- >
- >Whoopity-do. It'll be dealt with by the cops.
-
- "Whoopity-do"??? That's your comment about child-abuse?
-
- >And the number of priests who are illegally bothering with boys, can't
- >be as many as the number of non-priests in general.
-
- That's right. And the greatest number of child-abusers are heterosexual
- men. Usually the child's father or relative.
-
-
- Gordon
- Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
- Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), and Diana (Sorceress),
- and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it all.
- --
- The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
- of whatever company you think I work for. So there, thhhbbbt!
- Message to Kodak: Freedom for Dan Bredy.
-