home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!crdgw1!rdsunx.crd.ge.com!pan!keegan
- From: keegan@pan.crd.ge.com (James G Keegan Jr)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Another good reason not to vote for Bush
- Message-ID: <1992Aug17.181511.14594@crd.ge.com>
- Date: 17 Aug 92 18:15:11 GMT
- References: <16n43bINNh9h@agate.berkeley.edu> <n1cypnr@rpi.edu> <1992Aug17.154217.19815@wuecl.wustl.edu>
- Sender: usenet@crd.ge.com (Required for NNTP)
- Reply-To: james g keegan jr <keegan@crd.ge.com>
- Distribution: na
- Organization: T.S.A.K.C.
- Lines: 26
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pan.crd.ge.com
- Disclaimer: i speak for myself only, unless noted otherwise
-
- dgp@atlas.wustl.edu (Don Porter) writes:
- -> <n1cypnr@rpi.edu> (rocker) writes:
- -> > I think a friend of mine put it best when she
- -> > noted that people who oppose abortion are
- -> > generally those who are unlikely ever to need one.
- ->
- -> A fair comment. But consider that the arrow of
- -> cause-effect can go the other way too.
- ->
- -> That is, you are saying there are people who are
- -> unlikely to need an abortion who then conclude they
- -> are opposed to abortion.
- ->
- -> You should remember that there are also people who
- -> are opposed to abortion, who then guide their lives
- -> in such ways that they will be unlikely to ever need
- -> one.
-
- it is when these people try not only to guide the lives
- of others, but impose their beliefs through legislation
- upon those who don't share those beliefs, that i get
- concerned.
-
- --
- ----
- charter member ... T.S.A.K.C.
-