home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!cleveland.Freenet.Edu!cc843
- From: cc843@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Paul A. Voytas)
- Subject: Re: Balloon Launches
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.171052.25557@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ins.cwru.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: slc8.ins.cwru.edu
- Reply-To: cc843@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Paul A. Voytas)
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (USA)
- References: <Bt7Kpw.3xo.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 92 17:10:52 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
-
- In a previous article, 18084TM@msu.edu (Tom) says:
-
- >I don't know if this is a wacko idea or what:
- >
- >Has there ever been any proposal or even thought of using lighter-than-air
- >platforms for launching small payloads? It seems to me that with a
- >dirigible designed to fly relativly fast, you could get pretty good cost
- >savings with it, as you could get both velocity and altitude advantages.
- >
- >-Tommy Mac
-
- Wacko or not, something like it was tried. The Air Force had a project
- (called FARSIDE) in the early sixties (I think) that used balloon
- launched rockets called ROCKOONS. The idea was to lift the rockets
- up 20 miles or so and then launch them through the balloon. At least
- two rockets were launched this way.
-
- Descriptions of schemes to have a floating spaceport in the stratosphere
- are also seen from time to time. These would be huge floating structures
- with runways for single stage to orbit type of vehicles. Of course,
- you have to get everything up there in the first place....
-
- PAV
-