home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.skeptic:14354 talk.origins:9515
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!jloucks
- From: jloucks@uts.amdahl.com (Jim Loucks)
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,talk.origins
- Subject: Re: Rant! Rave! (was: Fermat( was: Noah's Ark))
- Message-ID: <31nz03n.5egE00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>
- Date: 14 Aug 92 21:52:57 GMT
- References: <3bzg03JJ59bI00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <1992Aug12.135602.8695@iccgcc.decnet.ab.com> <c15403hR59Gn00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <1992Aug13.152432.20000@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com>
- Distribution: na
- Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
- Lines: 30
-
- max@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com (Max Webb) writes:
- >Once again, Jim flees headlong from the slightest appearance of logic. Jim,
- >when you call someone a Muslim, do you first check and make sure they
- >have all of the virtues that the Koran extolls?
-
- That was logic? Sigh.
-
- If someone refers to themself as a follower of something, yet fails
- to practice the teaching of that same thing, *that* is a hypocrite,
- and *that* is *part* of the issue here. Another part of the issue
- is people such as *yourself* that cannot see the simple logic it takes
- to deduce these facts. People such as *yourself* who instigate crap
- similar to what you've done here. People such as *yourself* who argue
- merely for the sake of arguing. People such as *yourself*... well,
- anything further and I would be guilty of the same behaviour as
- *yourself.*
-
- >No?
-
- Nope.
-
- >Then you are a hypocrite.
-
- If that is how you define hypocrite I suggest you purchase a dictionary.
-
- You have taken up enough of my time,
-
- --
- Jim Loucks jloucks@uts.amdahl.com
- {apple, pyramid, sun, uunet}!amdahl!jloucks
-