home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.skeptic:14350 talk.origins:9509
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rphroy!hydra.cs.gmr.com!hamilton
- From: hamilton@hydra.cs.gmr.com (William E. Hamilton CS50 CS/50)
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,talk.origins
- Subject: Re: Rant! Rave! (was: Fermat( was: Noah's Ark))
- Message-ID: <88523@rphroy.ph.gmr.com>
- Date: 14 Aug 92 20:36:50 GMT
- Article-I.D.: rphroy.88523
- References: <3ahX039R59DK00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <1992Aug13.032002.16374@hilbert.cyprs.rain.com> <1992Aug13.122453.29534@news.nd.edu>
- Sender: news@rphroy.ph.gmr.com
- Reply-To: hamilton@gmr.com (William E. Hamilton CS50 CS/50)
- Followup-To: sci.skeptic
- Organization: GM Research Labs, Warren, MI
- Lines: 58
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hydra.cs.gmr.com
-
- In article <1992Aug13.122453.29534@news.nd.edu> scharle@lukasiewicz.cc.nd.edu (Scharle) writes:
- > ...
- > Perhaps it should be pointed out that there is an ancient heresy in
- >Christianity (Gnosticism) which says, among other things, that the
- >maker of the world is not God.
- >
- I believe they also claimed that there was some special knowledge
- that was given only to them which enabled them to know God and
- receive salvation. Furthermore, I believe they believed that God is
- not necessarily good, (and therefore might well resort to
- deceptions like apparent age). Is this the characteristic of gnosticism
- you see in creationism, Tom?
-
- > It seems to some of us that creationism borders on that heresy. We
- >think about that again when a creationist hints that the world which
- >science studies -- with radioactivity, ice cores, speed of light --
- >has been built with the intention of deceiving us. Obviously, such a
- >deception is not the work of God.
- >
- > Who or what
- > made the laws of physics
- > put the fossils in the earth
- > put all of those layers in the ice caps
- > made the stars and galaxies
- > put, in every living thing, the evidence for the genetic
- > relationships between all of us,
- >knowing that we have the kind of intelligence that would lead us to
- >interpret those things as saying that the world and life is ancient,
- >and that life is all related?
-
- And, to borrow an idea from Augustine, if He gave us misleading information
- in nature, how could we trust what He says about salvation?
- >
- > Here are some possibilities:
- > God (theistic evolution)
- > A deceiving demiurge (gnostic creationism)
- >
- To me, it's too easy to turn theistic evolution into deism. So I personally
- wouldn't say I susbscribe to theistic evolution without adding rather
- emphatically that God always has and always will exercise His sovereignty
- over the operation of the universe. Evolution as a mechanism is well supported
- by the data available to us. But I don't see it as a complete, sufficient
- explanation for all of life. Obviously I don't claim that that position
- is a scientific one. It's a Christian one.
-
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Bill Hamilton |
- GM Res/Env staff ----+----
- Computer Science Dept. | Now faith is the assurance of things
- Warren, MI 48090-9055 | hoped for, the conviction of things
- (313) 986 1474 | not seen. Heb 11:1
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy Him forever
- - The Westminster Shorter Catechism
- >--
- >Tom Scharle |cm65n6@irishmvs(Bitnet)
- >Room G003 Computing Center |scharle@lukasiewicz.cc.nd.edu(Internet)
- >University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, IN 46556-0539 USA
-