home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.skeptic:14263 alt.conspiracy:9967 alt.activism:14743 talk.politics.guns:19226
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.conspiracy,alt.activism,talk.politics.guns
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!rpi!batcomputer!genie!ncgia!mars.caps.maine.edu!dartvax!fluent!fluent!bd
- From: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
- Subject: Re: Killing bers with handguns (Was: Re: A random thought)
- In-Reply-To: viking@iastate.edu's message of 12 Aug 92 23:11:29 GMT
- Message-ID: <BD.92Aug13092406@fluent.UUCP>
- Sender: bd@fluent@dartmouth.EDU (Brice Dowaliby)
- Reply-To: bd%fluent@dartmouth.EDU
- Organization: Fluent Inc., Lebanon NH
- References: <BD.92Aug11090700@fluent.UUCP> <ART.92Aug11130024@world.std.com> <BD.92Aug12095025@fluent.UUCP> <1992Aug12.221115.17863@athena.mit.edu> <viking.713661089@vincent1.iastate.edu>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: 13 Aug 92 09:24:06
- Lines: 13
-
-
- viking@iastate.edu (Dan Sorenson) writes:
-
- >I'd say the animal has a pretty good chance of killing the hunter in both
- >of these actions, and isn't that what makes it a sport?
-
- IMO, no. By your example, then, none of the track and field events are sport.
- It's about time to let this thread die, but I stand by my initial post.
-
- Shooting a sleeping animal at close range is not, IMO, a sporitng thing
- to do.
- --
- Brice Dowaliby | I don't speak for them.
-