home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.skeptic:14199 sci.physics:12745
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!ariel!mulka!cde
- From: cde@mulka (Colin Entwisle)
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,sci.physics
- Subject: Re: help needed with a thought problem
- Message-ID: <2941@ariel.its.unimelb.EDU.AU>
- Date: 12 Aug 92 23:01:31 GMT
- References: <BssCIL.1o6@apollo.hp.com>
- Sender: news@ariel.its.unimelb.EDU.AU
- Followup-To: sci.skeptic
- Lines: 25
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
-
- : In article <FRANL.92Jul28211500@draco.centerline.com> franl@centerline.com (Fran Litterio) writes:
- : >chesky@squirrel.austin.ibm.com (Bill Chesky) writes:
- : >
- : >> Suppose there is this gigantic rod floating out in space. Just for
- : >> fun, says its, oh, 1,000,000 miles long. Further this rod is ...
- : >> ... perfectly rigid. Now
- : >> suppose you have some mechanism on one end whose purpose is to push and
- : >> pull (longways) on the rod. Is this not a FTL communications device ...
- : >
- : > It cannot exist, therefore it cannot be an FTL communications device.
-
-
- For one end of a rod to move in response to the other end moving
- (regardless of its length) requires one bit telling the next bit whats
- happening and such transfer happens below c.
-
- eg if you view the rod as a an array of atoms (and afterall alot of people
- do), moving one end is moving some atoms, then their neighbors get pushed
- (or whatever the movement was) by them, then the next atoms by those, and
- so on down the length of the rod. Sort of like a wave propogating.
-
- anyway in aint ftl
-
- Colin
-
-