home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!destroyer!ncar!unmvax!mimbres.cs.unm.edu!nmt.edu!houle
- From: houle@nmt.edu (Paul Houle)
- Subject: Re: Plasmak/Paul Koloc
- Message-ID: <1992Aug19.153710.7498@nmt.edu>
- Organization: New Mexico Tech
- References: <12AUG199216475632@lims02.lerc.nasa.gov> <1992Aug19.113435.27357@prometheus.UUCP>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 15:37:10 GMT
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Aug19.113435.27357@prometheus.UUCP> pmk@prometheus.UUCP (Paul M. Koloc) writes:
-
- >We are have slipped 6 to eight weeks for a number of reasons.
- >Still the commencing of diagnostic work will require three months
- >before we have enough data and information (analysis) to start pulling
- >chains.
- >
- >I would say to query again in around the end of January or into February.
- >
- >+---------------------------------------------------------+**********+
- >| Paul M. Koloc, President, Prometheus II, Ltd. +Commercial*
- >| Bx 222, College Park, MD 20740-0222 ***FUSION***
- >| mimsy!promethe!pmk pmk%prometheus@mimsy.umd.edu ***in the***
- >| (301) 445-1075 promethe=prometheus **Nineties**
- >+---------------------------------------------------------************
-
- I'm curious about what sort of device you are testing. Is it
- simply a larger and more powerful PLASMAK assembler, or is it actually
- intended to produce a nuclear yield? If so, what kind of fuel are you
- using? Can you tell us anything else about it?
-
-
- --
-